May Be Getting Sued

Discussion in 'Off Topic Discussion' started by The_spacemonkey, Apr 19, 2004.

  1. Feandil

    Feandil Full Member

    well you have to remember were are not currenly dealing with Crimnal Law

    These are Civil Litigations, so infact the Burden of Proof is shared Equally, and the Threashold is not "resonabvle doubt" but "beyond perpondrous of the Evidance" or "more likly than not"

    a MUCH MUCH lower Burden

    and if anyone takes this all the way, I fully expect them to be Auhtoirzed to Search your house with Just the IP and Infro about that IP [/b][/quote]
    Warrants for IP addresses????? <_< <_<

    Trust me it'll never happen. That is SO SO SO un-warranted evidence. Especially if the IP belongs to a DSL user who's IP changes.

    Mikey just so you know.... the Burden of proof is always on the prosecution.... even in civil suits. Civil suits ALSO require more than "a more than likely" decision. Even if that's how Civil cases worked.... any good defense lawyer could win these cases.

    There WILL never be any real proof that the defender had actually PERSONALLY downloaded these files. And that's what it would require..... 100%!

    You can not prosecute an IP address....
     
  2. The_spacemonkey

    The_spacemonkey Full Member

    pssshhhh... every third file I download off kazaa I have to pry a virus or adware off of.
     
  3. The_Ancient

    The_Ancient Full Member

    first, Please do not Call me "mikey" IMO that is a condensending name, and it really really really really makes me mad when people say it ;)

    Next, Some People Said the Paritot Act would never Pass but it did,
    Some people Said "The Right to Bear arms would not be Infringed" yet in most large cites you can not carry

    the point, Never Say never, I have no Doubts that a judge would issue a Search warrant based soley on a IP, personally I dont think they would even need a IP, Judges are just a Crooked as the People Wanting the warrants

    and your Wrong, the Burden of Proof in Civil Cases is FAR FAR FAR FAR lower than in Criminal Cases, and In Civil Cases you have to Prove your not Resposible, just as they have to Prove you are
     
  4. delvryboy

    delvryboy Full Member

    hmm, i heard some talk about kazza lite earlier

    i swear i read somewhere, CNN or MSNBC, that kazza lite was a clone program made by the RIAA to track kazza downloads :blink:
     
  5. deyton

    deyton Full Member

    I've heard this as well actually, don't know from where.
     
  6. The_Ancient

    The_Ancient Full Member

    I dont think so..............

    the RIAA does NOT track, or Record anything in reality, they use 4 differant Contractors to Collect the IP's
     
  7. delvryboy

    delvryboy Full Member

    i could be wrong about the RIAA, but i swear there was something specific about kazza lite not actually being kazza
     
  8. The_Ancient

    The_Ancient Full Member

    klite has been torn apart... there is nothing going on with it ;)


    a Guy in Denmark I believe Created the Orginal one

    but all it is, is Kazza with Spyware and Adware removed, nothing more, and nothing less

    but you better be Careful, your starting to act like me,

    Thinking there is always somthing sinister Going on :p
     
  9. delvryboy

    delvryboy Full Member

    haha, you should read my post in "CAF is down" :ph34r: