Iraq

But does it take 1,000,000 troops to make that decision????

 

I was responding to one of Mike's post's not yours. He said that we went into Iraq like bullies and took them over because they couldn't even defend themselves.

 

Because I would not have seen live pictures of Town Town Bagdad in lesss than 3weeks if they were able to defend themselves

How is that?
I am Talking about the lack of AFFORDABLE health Insurance for the masses, I have none right now, My work does not offer any until you have been with the company for 1 year and made over $27,000 (in a years time) and for me to get it else where with a resonable decutable (less than $1,000) is if about $100 a month to $250 a month, to much for me right now...

And once your homeless it is near impossible to get a job, no matter how low the unemployment rate is, EVERY empolyer wants a Address and Phone #, if you dont have that are SOL

1> They have been ingnoring those issues for YEARS

2> Never said we should not invest in a military,

I dont even know what to say here, has nothing to do with anything i have said, are you reading my posts????

Never Said they were not happy, never said it is not a good thing that Saddam is Gone, Never Said i disagreed with the war persay

But I DID say it will not change much in the grand scheme of things.....

and that this war is Pointless

 

if we are worried about nukes, there are other more Develope Area we need to be Fighting in then

1> China

They have had nukes for YEARS, and we pay them off every year, they have enough people they could over run us, we could spray them and bomb them, we would run out of ammo before they run out of people lol :lol: :lol: :lol:

2> N Korea

Openly started a Nuke Operation

3> Sudan

Openly has a Nuke program and Openly Admits they will give the nukes to terror groups when/if they make one or more


What about them?????

 

I think i was talking about the justification of the war with Iraq, not with China, N. Korea, and Sudan. So are you telling me a war with them would be justified????

 

No, I am saying those wars would be more justifed than this one

As they DO, have nuclear weapons or ARE developing them


We, the american people, have no way o knowing if Iraq Has/Had them, only the Government Says they do, and Frankly this governemnt lies more than it tells the truth

if they do fine,

But this is still a scary precident, Preemptive attacks have never been our Frogein Policy, and WILL be precevied as america Bullying other Countries around

Taking Iraq out of the equation will not solve terrorism, it will not stop development of Weapons of mass destruction, it will not make us safer

Russia has a large number of unaccountong for Nukes, and that government is not really in control over the population so they can be easly if they have not already be sold to the highest bidder

So shold we take over Russia?

N Korea is openly making Nukes,

So should we Take of N Korea?

Pakistan has Nukes,

So should we take over Paskistan

I could go on, there are soooooooo many countires that are nuclear

and dont forget about us, we have more nukes, Bio, and Chemical Weapons than anyone on this planet, so why we run around saying "no you can not have them" we are shown to the hyprocritcal because we have them MOST.....

While you can aruge we will not use them, what contry it the ONLY country to use a Weapon of Mass Desturction???? Yes WE ARE, so our creditablity in that is null and void

 

well I never shut up :lol:


1> Thank you for Proving my point, they could not defend themselves (aka no match for our troops)

2>We do have a stable government, but I highly doubt they will use them apporiately, sicne there is NO apporiate use for them,

3> How do you figure it is "just in time" they to my knowlege they have found NO working weapons, the MIGHT have found parts, or peices to them, the other Countries have FULLY WORKING weapons, hmmmm